![]() ![]() Tell me what you think, why I'm wrong? I wanna hear. But that's just my humble opinion.īut don't let me be the final verdict. For that alone, I think this movie is better. Anyway, I think the performance is better, I think the score is better (Kristin Absjoren-spelled wrong I know) wrote the entire Goddamn soundtrack to this movie. In Barfly, it almost seemed like "Yea! I'm a drunk! Lets fight! Lets party! Lets buy drinks FOR ALL MY FRIEEEEENNNNDDDS!" And don't even get me started on that. I think the mood is there, the atmosphere is there, and the hopelessness is there, something I think was lacking in Barfly. Simply because I think it better captures Hank Chinaski's desolate approach to finding anything that will sustain him. Mickey Rourke? Or Matt Dilon? I'd like to hear your opinion on why which movie of yours is superior.Īnd my favorite in particular is Factotum. ![]() ![]() Is it Barfly? Or Factotum? Who is better at portraying Buk/Chinaski. If this has already been asked, then I apologize. And I couldn't think of a better place to ask it than here. I've asked this philosophical/cinematic question for years now. That's right, I dare ask this question on the Bukowski fansite. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |